Re: [PATCH 3/3] gnu: Add octave and dependencies

[John Darrington]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:

     > Ok.  Andraes' and Ludo's explanations convince me.  However I'm 
skeptical that
     > the Octave devs would be quite so convinced.  And removing the 
propagates-inputs
     > will mean patching to the Octave source and I don't know how difficult 
this will be.
     
     The patch that would be great upstream is:
     
       AC_PATH_PROG([MAKEINFO], [makeinfo])
       AC_SUBST([MAKEINFO])
     
     and then use address@hidden@??? wherever ???makeinfo??? is expected in the 
source
     (similarly for ???less???, etc.)

     Ludo???.

Having thought about this some more, looked to see what is currently in the 
octave source and "discussed" the issue on #octave I think now the best solution
is to simply remove all the propagated-inputs from the package (and leave inputs
and native-inputs as they are).  Rationale:

* Octave "works" without all these programs (albeit in a rather featureless 
  fashion).  If a user wants to add the feature, then she just needs to 
  guix package -i <foo>.
* It seems to have been a deliberate decision by the octave developers to rely 
  on $PATH to select the appropriate version of these external programs.
* Changing this behaviour would involve alterations to the octave source 
touching 
  many files, and I think upstream would be unlikely to cooperate with us.

The disadvantage of this approach is, that a guix user who installs octave, but 
not the other packages, gets only a barely functional version.  Perhaps we need 
a (recommended-inputs `(...)) like in debian.


Comments?


J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.