[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Feb 2014 23:17:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:54:04AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:33:20AM +0100, Sree Harsha Totakura wrote:
> > Here's the new patch with Andreas' changes and Openssl included as a
> > dependency.
> Thanks, I will have a look later.
Finally I made it. For checking purposes, I disabled gstreamer and
gst-plugins-base in libextractor. gnunet built without problems and passed
all its tests - congratulations!
Just one last question: Is there a reason you did not add libmicrohttpd as
an input? Or should I add it again?
The "official" description printed with "make sync-descriptions" is different,
but in fact adds only this sentence:
The package includes gnunet-gtk, which provides a GTK+ graphical user
interface to the GNUnet service.
I think here the official description should be changed. First of all,
what is "the package"? And as far as I can tell, gnunet-gtk would be a
distinct package.
Andreas
- Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/03
- Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe, Andreas Enge, 2014/02/05
- Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe, Andreas Enge, 2014/02/11
- Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/02/11
- [no subject], Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/02/12
- [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Fix failing testcases., Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/02/12
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Fix failing testcases., Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/12
- Re: none, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/12
- Re: none, Sree Harsha Totakura, 2014/02/12
- Re: none, Andreas Enge, 2014/02/12