[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: prefetch tarballs in a batch |
Date: |
Tue, 06 May 2014 22:02:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130009 (Ma Gnus v0.9) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Nikita Karetnikov <address@hidden> skribis:
> 1. It doesn’t seem to prefetch all the needed dependencies. ‘guix build
> hello’ (without network access) fails after prefetching the said
> package.
Fails how?
> 2. The substituter fails from time to time. Note that eight tests fail
> on the machine I used: ‘builders.scm’, ‘utils.scm’, ‘packages.scm’,
> ‘store.scm’, ‘monads.scm’, ‘gexp.scm’, ‘guix-package.sh’,
> ‘guix-register.sh’. Perhaps we ought to fix the mentioned failures
> first. Which log files would you like to see?
The SRFI-64 log files of the failing tests, plus test-suite.log. Test
failures must not remain uncorrected! ;-)
When there are so many failures, it’s likely that there’s a setup issue,
like socket names are too long.
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix prefetch -n icecat
> substitute-binary: guile: hashtab.c:137: vacuum_weak_hash_table: Assertion
> `removed <= len' failed.
What Guile and libgc version is this, and what platform?
> I’ve also seen this one. In case it matters, that was before running
> ‘chgrp 1001 /gnu/store; chmod 1775 /gnu/store’.
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix prefetch -n gnunet
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 157: 17 [catch #t #<catch-closure 9319ef0> ...]
[...]
> In guix/derivations.scm:
> 175: 3 [derivation-prerequisites-to-build # # # ...]
> In guix/store.scm:
> 695: 2 [substitutable-paths # #]
> 392: 1 [process-stderr #<build-daemon 256.14 9a29660> #f]
> In guix/serialization.scm:
> 51: 0 [read-int #<input-output: socket 11>]
>
> guix/serialization.scm:51:4: In procedure read-int:
> guix/serialization.scm:51:4: In procedure bv-u32-ref: Wrong type argument
> in position 1 (expecting bytevector): #<eof>
That seems similar no?
Does the installation seem sane, basically? Do ‘guix build’, ‘guix
package’ etc. work somehow, or not even?
> 3. When using the substituter, the command takes much more time. Do
> we even need it in this case? I seem to recall that the GNUnet
> tarball was served by Hydra, but I forgot the details.
There’s a local cache of substituter hits/failures in
/var/guix/substitute-binary (or similar.) When that cache is empty or
outdated, a lot of HTTP queries are made to hydra.gnu.org, which can
take a bit of time.
When using a recent Guile, these queries are made in parallel. On my
machine, it goes like this:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ sudo rm -rf /var/guix/substitute-binary/cache/
$ time guix build emacs -n
real 0m30.551s
user 0m2.519s
sys 0m0.154s
$ time guix build emacs -n
real 0m3.381s
user 0m2.039s
sys 0m0.123s
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The cost is high when starting from an empty cache, but afterwards it’s
small.
> +(define (show-help)
Add call to ‘show-build-options-help’ from (guix scripts build).
> +(define %options
> + ;; Specification of the command-line options.
> + (list (option '("no-substitutes") #f #f
> + (lambda (opt name arg result . rest)
> + (apply values
> + (alist-cons 'substitutes? #f
> + (alist-delete 'substitutes? result))
> + rest)))
Remove this option, and concatenate with ‘%standard-build-options’.
> + (filter-map (match-lambda
> + (('argument . value)
> + (identity ; discard the second value
The extra value gets truncated here, so it’s not strictly needed.
Thanks!
Ludo’.