[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix and The OS name?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Guix and The OS name? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:29:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130009 (Ma Gnus v0.9) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <address@hidden> skribis:
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> So the distribution is called “the GNU system”, or “GNU”.
>
> Hrm, isn't Guix also the name of the distro?
>
> https://gnu.org/s/guix/ says that "GNU Guix is a purely functional
> package manager for the GNU system, and a distribution thereof." And
> then the Guix logo has the "The GNU System" subtitle, and the page is
> about both the package manager and the distro, etc.
Yeah, there’s some ambiguity here.
> I suppose it makes sense to use the more specific name Guix when
> differentiating between GNU/Linux distros, talking about this specific
> project, etc., although the resulting distro is also *the* GNU distro.
I see what you mean.
OTOH I find it important to insist on the fact that GNU is a concrete
operating system. The fact that the “Download GNU” button on gnu.org
points to a mere list of GNU/Linux distribution isn’t helping the image
and strength of the GNU project, and cohesion within the project.
This is why I think we must build the actual GNU system, as initially
envisioned.
This is a conclusion I and others reached a few years ago at the GHM and
on gnu-system-discuss [0]. Similar motivations led to GSRC earlier.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[0] See the thread that starts at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-system-discuss/2012-03/msg00000.html>
and continues the following months.