[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Listing sub-system maintainers?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Listing sub-system maintainers? |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2014 22:20:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
There have not been many replies to your message, so I will quickly give
my opinion. The idea looks good to me.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:49:30PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> They have permission to check patches into the
> repository without obtaining approval first.
>
> - The Write After Approval Maintainers.
>
> These are developers who have write access to the Guix source tree.
> They can check in their own changes once a developer with the
> appropriate authority has approved the changes; they can also apply
> the Obvious Fix Rule (below).
>
> Maintainers should always post non-trivial patches to address@hidden
> Trivial patches include fixing typos, fixing obvious mistakes, etc.
I think we should be less contradictory, and give more freedom to the
maintainers. So I would state that maintainers are allowed to commit
non-controversial patches (which in fact they already do...).
Andreas
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Listing sub-system maintainers?,
Andreas Enge <=