Re: Texlive and native-inputs

[John Darrington]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:43:03PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
     On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 06:13:09PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
     > You are probably right - to be sure they should be manually checked.  An 
     > alternative would be to attempt cross building all the affected 
packages. 
     
     In the case that native inputs should instead be normal, if I understand
     correctly, cross-builds will succeed, but the built package will not be
     usable on the target system.
     
     Your suggestion detects cases where normal inputs should be native.

It should also do the inverse.  If, say, libpng is declared as native-input, 
when it
should be input, then it will fail at build stage.  Specifically at the linking 
stage when
the liker tries to link the target binary against the native -lpng.

However in the case of things like perl, I suppose this relates to what I was 
saying earlier 
about putting the onus on the user to install it rather than making it an input.

     
     > In the case of perl, python, etc I recall that previous discussions 
     > concluded that if they are needed in installed scripts, then it should 
be up to the 
     > user to install them.
     
     No, as I understand it, the patch-shebang is there so that scripts run
     without installing additional interpreters.

I certainly remember in the case of octave we decided not to patch-shebang and 
have the user 
install the additional interpreters, but this may not be a universal policy.  I 
think it depends
on if the additional interpreters are there as part of the core functionality 
or as an 
optional feature.
     
J'

-- 
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature