[PATCH] emacs: Add 'guix-prettify'.

[Alex Kost]

Ludovic Courtès (2014-11-06 12:37 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès (2014-11-05 23:12 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
[...]
>>>> I've realized that "pretty-sha-path" is a bad name, because those 32
>>>> numbers and letters have nothing to do with SHA-sequences as I thought
>>>> initially.  So maybe it would be better to rename it into
>>>> "pretty-hash-path" or "guix-pretty-path" (as it will be a part of Guix)
>>>> or something else.  Or is it OK to leave it as it is?
>>>
>>> Good point.  Prefixing with ‘guix-’ makes sense, and it will be easier
>>> for users to find it.
>>>
>>> While we’re at it, “path” in GNU normally means “search path”, not “file
>>> name” (info "(standards) GNU Manuals"), so perhaps
>>> ‘guix-pretty-file-names’ or something like that would be even better.
>>> WDYT?
>>
>> I think ‘guix-pretty-file-names’ is too long for a package name as all
>> symbols have to be prefixed with it.  What about ‘guix-prettify’?
>
> OK!

Thanks, here is the patch again: the package was renamed; regexp was
corrected; a reference in “guix.texi” was made and "path"-s were
replaced by "file name"-s.  It's still not too late to rename everything
if ‘guix-prettify’ looks unsatisfactory.

0001-emacs-Add-guix-prettify.patch
Description: Text Data