[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-libreoffice
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: wip-libreoffice |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:22:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:31:02PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> I don't know what this sentance means.
Do something similar as my last patch on wip-libreoffice:
Add a line
(supported-systems `("x86_64-linux"))
to the nss package.
No idea if this would be enough.
Personally, I still prefer to work bottom-up by adding dependencies first
(actually, I usually do a depth-first traversal of the dependency graph).
I will do what you suggested. But like you say, it would seem sensible to me,
if this entire branch is built
only for x86_64, at least for the time being.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- wip-libreoffice, John Darrington, 2014/11/13
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/14
- Re: wip-libreoffice, John Darrington, 2014/11/14
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/18
- Re: wip-libreoffice, John Darrington, 2014/11/19
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/20
- Re: wip-libreoffice, John Darrington, 2014/11/21
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/21
- Re: wip-libreoffice, John Darrington, 2014/11/21
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/21
- Re: wip-libreoffice,
John Darrington <=
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Andreas Enge, 2014/11/21
- Re: wip-libreoffice, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/11/21