[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libreoffice building (sort of)
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Libreoffice building (sort of) |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:07:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington <address@hidden> skribis:
> Well currently the libreoffice package in wip-libreoffice branch,
builds, installs and
> seems to work ok.
Wo0t! Excellent!
> Slightly worrying is that the first few builds crashed in one of LO's
unittests. I added
> the line (setenv "CPPUNITTRACE" "gdb --args") which I expected just to
give me a backtrace
> to help me diagnose the problem. I was very surprised doing this,
caused the package to
> build, test and install without error! -- A Heisenbug.
How is $CPPUNITTRACE used exactly? If it???s used as in:
sh -c $CPPUNITTRACE test-program
then I???m surprised it works at all, because ???gdb --args test-program???
just spawns an interactive GDB session.
Any idea what happens?
Yes, I was suprised too. Maybe it runs some preprepared script.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature