[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-arm
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: wip-arm |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:53:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:19:44PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
> John Darrington <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > It contains the start of a port to an Arm architecture. Currently
> > it hasn't got very far unfortunately.
>
> It allow you to cross-build the bootstrap tarballs for ARM, right?
>
>
> Does anyone know the next step?
>
> The bootstrap tarballs are insufficient to natively build guix on the target
> machine.
Yes, that’s expected.
> And I have been unable to build a version of Guile which is up to the job -
> they all
> have one problem or another.
The machine should already have a working Guile, GCC, libgcrypt, etc.
Using the bootstrap tools for that job may fail unexpected.
(Since you gave access to your armv7 box, I tried to get Guile running,
but haven’t been very far yet. I’ll keep you updated.)
> The Porting section in the manual says that I must "update" some files and
> return the "right
> name" and that it must be "taught about the new platform". Can anyone
> elaborate on this?
> How do I know what parts of the files must be updated? Which name is "right"
> and how do
> I "teach" it about the new platform?
Commit 1c0c417d expounds that section a bit. Commit f57ff219a, which
added mips64el-linux, should also give you info.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: wip-arm,
Ludovic Courtès <=