[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Invalid nar signature
From: |
Thompson, David |
Subject: |
Re: Invalid nar signature |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:08:53 -0500 |
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think this is due to a subtly misleading file format variation.
>
> If you look at ‘export-paths’, it does:
>
> while there are files to write
> write-long-long 1
> export-path file
> write-long-long 0
>
> ‘restore-file-set’ does the opposite, which is to read that long-long to
> determine whether there’s data coming up, and then to call
> ‘restore-file’.
Thanks. I'm still a little confused, though. I'm not sure what
change I need to make in order to satisfy the substituter. Do I need
to write a variant of export-paths that leaves off the initial
write-long-long call?
- Dave