[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:56:10 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> I was able to natively build bootstrap tarballs on the Novena. However,
> the compiler in these new bootstrap tarballs is broken. The problem is
> that the new compiler driver (gcc) passes -lgcc_s when linking, but
> libgcc_s.so does not exist in the gcc bootstrap tarball.
[...]
> It turns out that the "-lgcc_s" above was added just a few days after
> we generated our last set of bootstrap tarballs, in commit a7bf595ff.
>
> I guess that ever since that commit, any natively-built bootstrap
> tarballs we generated for any platform would have created a broken
> compiler, and that this is the first time we've tried since then.
>
> Any suggestions on how best to fix this? My first crude idea is to
> simply remove the "-lgcc_s" from %gcc-static.
For now, this is the approach I took, in commit 5336e4c74.
Mark
- Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Mark H Weaver, 2015/01/01
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Mark H Weaver, 2015/01/01
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/02
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Mark H Weaver, 2015/01/03
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/07
- Re: Problem with natively-built armhf bootstrap compiler, Mark H Weaver, 2015/01/07
- [PATCH] gnu: gcc-static: Remove -lgcc_s from GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC, Mark H Weaver, 2015/01/07
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-static: Remove -lgcc_s from GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/01/07