Re: Trivial build system

[Andreas Enge]

I also wonder if we should not modify the structure of our build system code.
Our different build systems end up calling gnu:gnu-build with a list of
phases.

Could this not be done all the time? And then a build system be defined as
a list of phases? For instance, trivial-build-system could be the empty
list, or better yet, the list containing 'unpack.

Then we could always take the #:phases argument of a package and modify it
by adding a phase, for instance; this would be easier than taking a #:build
argument and modify it, I think.

Andreas