[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Threading Building Blocks
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Threading Building Blocks |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:24:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:
> There are a couple of things I'm not sure about:
>
> - should the examples be included per default or should they go into a
> separate "doc" output together with the /doc directory? Together they
> take up about 10MB.
I would put them in “doc”.
> - the version number is only given as "4.3 Update 2 Current version" on
> the download page. I turned this into "4.3.2", but I'm not sure if
> this is really equivalent or if we should rather use the datestamp on
> the tarball (= "43_20141204")
“4.3.2” looks good. If need be, the numbering scheme can always be
adjusted later.
> From 3e5e1e49893c73f8b9a565edcae5388f548dd13a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:12:31 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add Threading Building Blocks.
>
> * gnu/packages/tbb.scm: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
[...]
> + (alist-cons-before
> + 'build 'set-build-path
> + (lambda _
> + (substitute* "build/common.inc"
> + (("export tbb_build_prefix.+$")
> + "export tbb_build_prefix?=guix\n")))
Rather put this in ‘snippet’ (I think Mark made this comment on IRC.)
> + (synopsis "The Threading Building Blocks library abstracts low-level
> +threading details")
What about “C++ library for parallel programming” instead?
> + (description
> + "Threading Building Blocks (TBB) is a C++ runtime library that abstracts
> +the low-level threading details necessary for optimal multi-core performance.
> +It uses common C++ templates and coding style to eliminate tedious threading
> +implementation work.
> +
> +TBB requires fewer lines of code to achieve parallelism than other threading
> +models. The applications you write are portable across platforms. Since the
> +library is also inherently scalable, no code maintenance is required as more
> +processor cores become available.")
I would indeed remove the 2nd paragraph, and perhaps add something like
“It provides parallel loop constructs, asynchronous tasks,
synchronization primitives, atomic operations, and more.”
> + ;; GPL2 with exceptions
Rather: “GPLv2 with run-time exception:
<https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/licensing#runtime-exception>”.
Thanks,
Ludo’.