[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: luajit: install symlinks for libluajit library
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: luajit: install symlinks for libluajit library |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:03:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Tomáš Čech <address@hidden> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/lua.scm (luajit): don't require ldconfig - add "LDCONFIG=true"
> to make command line, add luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch so both symlinks are
> created
> * gnu/packages/patches/luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch: New file
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Adjust accordingly.
>
> Install phase of luajit contained:
>
> ldconfig /gnu/store/…-luajit-2.0.3/lib && \
> ln -sf libluajit-5.1.so.2.0.3 /gnu/store/…-luajit-2.0.3/lib/libluajit-5.1.so
> && \
> ln -sf libluajit-5.1.so.2.0.3 /gnu/store/…-luajit-2.0.3/lib/libluajit-5.1.so
> || :
>
> 1) When ldconfig is missing, symlinks are not created but whole expression
> returns no error. This cause linker not to find proper library when
> building package against luajit and libluajit-5.1.a is used instead. With
> 'LDCONFIG=true' it ommits the problem.
>
> 2) same symlink is created twice, luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch fixes that.
Good catch, thanks for investigating!
> (arguments
> '(#:tests? #f ;luajit is distributed without tests
> #:phases (alist-delete 'configure %standard-phases)
> - #:make-flags (list (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs
> "out")))))
> + ; poorly formulated expression doesn't create symlinks for dynamic
> library on ldconfig failure
> + ; ldconfig is useless anyway so success always with `true'
> + #:make-flags (list "LDCONFIG=true" (string-append "PREFIX="
> (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))))
Some nitpicking: please use double-colon for block comments, capitalize
sentences, add periods at the end of sentences, and wrap lines to 80
chars.
s/poorly formulated expression/The Makefile/
And perhaps add something like: “Set LDCONFIG=true to work around it.”,
to make it clear what the solution is and how it relates to the problem.
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch
> b/gnu/packages/patches/luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c6b4eec
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/luajit-2.0.3-symlink.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +diff -up LuaJIT-2.0.3/Makefile.orig LuaJIT-2.0.3/Makefile
> +--- LuaJIT-2.0.3/Makefile.orig 2014-03-12 13:10:00.000000000 +0100
> ++++ LuaJIT-2.0.3/Makefile 2015-02-02 23:52:30.774723789 +0100
> +@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ INSTALL_PCNAME= luajit.pc
> + INSTALL_STATIC= $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_ANAME)
> + INSTALL_DYN= $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_SONAME)
> + INSTALL_SHORT1= $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_SOSHORT)
> +-INSTALL_SHORT2= $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_SOSHORT)
> ++INSTALL_SHORT2= $(INSTALL_LIB)/$(INSTALL_SOSHORT).$(MAJVER)
Please add a comment above the hunk explaining what the patch does, why,
and what its upstream status is.
Could you send an updated patch?
Thanks!
Ludo’.