[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ffmpeg patches
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: ffmpeg patches |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:07:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:54:02PM +0100, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
> - The second adds a (gnu packages audio) import to (gnu packages video),
> which makes sense I think because video media usually contains audio,
> but in my Audacity patch I had added (gnu packages video) to (gnu
> packages audio) because Audacity uses FFmpeg, and that would be a
> circular import. I would say Audacity should go into its own module,
> and we will have to remember that we cannot import video from audio.
that sounds convincing to me.
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:13:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: ffmpeg: Fix comment.
> * gnu/packages/video.scm (ffmpeg): Remove libmp3lame from the comments listing
> additional optional dependencies, because it's already been added on the
> meanwhile.
Frankly, I would just include this silently into the second patch, dropping
a comment that has obviously become useless does not warrant its own commit
(others may have different opinons).
Is there a patch number 3?
Andreas
- ffmpeg patches, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2015/02/25
- Re: ffmpeg patches,
Andreas Enge <=