|
From: | Eric Bavier |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Scikit-learn. |
Date: | Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:03:37 -0600 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 |
On 2015-02-26 11:59, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:11:03PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:I think a Python “module” is a single .py file. In that case “package”seems more accurate, no?Indeed, that is true. Still I am looking for a justification to rename "python2-py2cairo" to "python2-cairo"
The issue in this case is that py2cairo and pycairo are actually different projects. I chose to use the name python2-py2cairo, to go with our "least divergence from upstream" method.
that is, use the module name for a package containing a single module.
This could become error-prone. The packager needs to check the interface of the library before deciding on a package name? It might also not be future-proof, in the event that a project updates its public interface.
-- `~Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |