Re: zsh and fish missed in /etc/shells?

[Axel]

Thank you for explanation, I installed these packages system wide and
got symbolic links. I prepared the patch for gnu/system.scm but I
unsure about the way I used to check packages availability
(find-packages-by-name). I see only the problem when one user
installed the package and other don't — the new shell will be added to
the list anyway. But I not found how to check that package was
installed system wide.

And generally should we check that shells really installed or just
unconditionally add paths to /etc/shells? I will modify patch then.



2015-03-09 11:59 GMT+03:00 Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden>:
> Axel <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Could we append /etc/shells with `zsh` or `fish` paths after these
>> shells installed in the system?
>
> Sure!  Would you like to submit a patch?  This is in gnu/system.scm.
>
>> And I think these shells should be linked to
>> /run/current-system/profile/bin/ as `bash` does.
>
> To do that, all you need to do is to add them to the ‘packages’ field of
> the ‘operating-system’ declaration:
>
>   (operating-system
>     ;; ...
>     (packages (cons* fish zsh %base-packages)))
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.



-- 
Александр Графов

0001-system-Add-fish-and-zsh-to-shells-list.patch
Description: Binary data