[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make packagers life easier
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: make packagers life easier |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:39:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 06:01:15PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > How to implement?
> > - inject always failing phase into phases list
> I’d like to read what others think because I’m probably biased, but my
> first reaction is that (1) I’ve rarely if ever felt the need for this,
> (2) adding a failing phase is easy to do by hand, and (3) it would be
> hard to implement this generically currently (phases are not exposed.)
Agreed. One thing that works when one adds a customised phase is to let
it finish with #f. Of course, if everything is standard, one needs to
add such a phase, which is a bit of typing. Maybe with Taylan's new syntax,
it has become easier.
Andreas