address@hidden writes:
On 2015-06-09 16:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
+ (description
+ "Xterm is bloated and unmaintainable. It has over 65K lines
of code and
Please write a more neutral description. Something like
"St implements a simple and light-weight terminal emulator. It
implements
256 colors, most VT10X escape sequences, utf8, X11 copy/paste,
antialiased fonts (using fontconfig), fallback fonts, resizing,
and line drawing."
It is nicer to write what a programme does well than to complain
about
what others do poorly.
Agreed. I created a new patch with the changes you requested and I've
run: ./pre-inst-env guix lint st.
Did you change the description at all? At first glance, it looks the
same as before. It should be more neutral, as Andreas said.
From 24e374cd99adb8efc1d6a9c5ba0d7cfb1f71828f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amz3 <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 19:04:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: add st.
* gnu/packages/dwm.scm (st): New variable.
* gnu/packages/patches/st-0.5-do-not-install-terminfo.patch: New file.
You would need to add this patch to 'dist_patch_DATA' in gnu-system.am
as well, but in this case I think it's better to make this change in a
custom phase using 'substitute*'. The reason is that if the user
requests the source code using 'guix build -S st', it should probably
not include that change, which is guix-specific.
It could be something like this: (untested)
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
#:phases
(modify-phases %standard-phases
(delete 'configure)
(add-after 'unpack 'inhibit-terminfo-install
(lambda _
(substitute* "Makefile"
(("address@hidden -s st.info") ""))
#t)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Also, we should probably rename dwm.scm to suckless.scm.
GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES in gnu-system.am should be updated accordingly,
keeping it sorted.
diff --git a/gnu/packages/dwm.scm b/gnu/packages/dwm.scm
index 98fa122..8ce078b 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/dwm.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/dwm.scm
Please add a copyright line for yourself to the top of the file.
@@ -22,7 +22,11 @@
#:use-module (guix download)
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
#:use-module (gnu packages)
- #:use-module (gnu packages xorg))
+ #:use-module (gnu packages xorg)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages fonts)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages ncurses)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config)
+ #:use-module ((gnu packages fontutils) #:prefix font-utils:))
Instead of adding a prefix for (gnu package fontutils), better to add a
'license:' prefix for (guix licenses) and update the 'license' fields
of
the existing packages accordingly.
(define-public dwm
(package
@@ -139,3 +143,47 @@ numbers of user-defined menu items efficiently.")
(description
"Simple X session lock with trivial feedback on password
entry.")
(license x11)))
+
+
+(define-public st
Just one blank line between packages please.
+ (package
+ (name "st")
+ (version "0.5")
+ (source
+ (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append "http://dl.suckless.org/st/st-"
+ version ".tar.gz"))
+ (patches (list (search-patch
"st-0.5-do-not-install-terminfo.patch")))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "0knxpzaa86pprng6hak8hx8bw22yw22rpz1ffxjpcvqlz3xdv05f"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ '(#:tests? #f ; no tests
+ #:make-flags (list "CC=gcc"
+ (string-append "PREFIX=" %output))
+ #:phases
+ (alist-delete 'configure %standard-phases)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("libx11" ,libx11)
+ ("libxft" ,libxft)
+ ("libxcomposite" ,libxcomposite)
+ ("compositeproto" ,compositeproto)
+ ("libxext" ,libxext)
+ ("xextproto" ,xextproto)
+ ("libxrender" ,libxrender)
+ ("fontconfig" ,font-utils:fontconfig)
+ ("freetype" ,font-utils:freetype)
+ ("font-liberation" ,font-liberation)))
+ (native-inputs `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
+ ("ncurses" ,ncurses)))
Is ncurses really needed here as a native-input? If 'st' needs to be
linked to it for use at run time, then it should be a normal input. It
should only be a native-input if it's needed at build time. That would
be surprising to me, since the build process within guix-daemon is
obviously non-interactive.