[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failing packages
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: failing packages |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:56:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 12:52:53PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Anything bioinformatics is not really used on non Intel architectures.
> It may change later but, yes, defaulting to x86_64 is the quick option
> for failing packages. I prefer we change them that way.
How about ngs-sdk, which fails on armhf with the slightly surprising error
message:
Configuring NGS-SDK package
checking system type... Linux
checking machine architecture... armv7l
configure: error: unsupported architecture 'Linux'
(and similarly on mips).
Is it okay to take out mips and arm from the supported architectures?
Andreas
- Re: failing packages, (continued)
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/16
- Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/16
- Re: failing packages, Pjotr Prins, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages,
Andreas Enge <=
- Re: failing packages, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
- Re: failing packages, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/10/18
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Andreas Enge, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Efraim Flashner, 2015/10/17
Re: failing packages, Federico Beffa, 2015/10/17