Re: [PATCH] services: nginx: Allow for server extensions.

[Ludovic Courtès]

David Thompson <address@hidden> skribis:

> Looking for some feedback on my first stab at making the nginx service
> extensible.  With this extension mechanism, future web applications
> (such as GNU MediaGoblin) that use nginx as a front-end web server will
> be able to extend nginx with the server configuration that they need in
> order to work.

Excellent!

> Here's a useless service that adds nginx configuration to serve the
> contents of /tmp:
>
>     (define server
>       (plain-file "foo.conf"
>                   "
>     server {
>       listen 80;
>       root /tmp;
>       index index.html;
>       server_name dthompson.us;
>     }
>     "))

Do you think it would make sense to provide Scheme bindings for those
‘server’ configuration snippets, or would we lose too much
expressiveness?

> From 108db2d183526c42b53060e55f7fb292b53663cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: David Thompson <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:49:08 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] services: nginx: Allow for server extensions.
>
> * gnu/services/web.scm (<nginx-configuration>)[servers]: New field.
>   (nginx-configuration-servers): New accessor.
>   (default-nginx-config): Delete.
>   (nginx-configuration-file*): New procedure.
>   (nginx-activation): Perform the syntax check on the full computed
>   configuration file.
>   (nginx-dmd-service): Use the full computed configuration file when
>   starting the service.
>   (extend-nginx): New procedure.
>   (nginx-service-type): Specify extension procedures.
>   (nginx-service): Add #:servers argument.

[...]

> +(define (nginx-configuration-file* config)

‘nginx-configuration->file’ maybe?

Otherwise LGTM!

As an exercise, and while waiting for Chris to finish packaging
MediaGoblin ;-), it might make sense to try to use nginx in
‘guix-publish-service’ or a variant thereof.

Thank you!

Ludo’.