[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: armhf build machines
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: armhf build machines |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 13:28:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the
> > website
> > was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
> > build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry
> > Pi 2 isn't great, but in terms of cost its pretty inexpensive. Is this
> > something we'd be interested in?
>
> We are waiting for two new Novena boards that should arrive before the
> end of the year. The current bottleneck is not the build machines, but hydra;
> already now the build farm could sustain more jobs in parallel, but we
> artificially limit them. So I would say that there is currently no need
> to add more build machines. This may change if we get a physical machine
> for hydra.
What sort of machine would be appropriate for hydra?
> Andreas
>
>
- armhf build machines, Efraim Flashner, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Andreas Enge, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/07
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/08
- Re: armhf build machines, Mark H Weaver, 2015/12/08
- Re: armhf build machines, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/09