[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test failure of ilmbase-2.2.0 on i686-linux (testBoxAlgo.cpp)
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Test failure of ilmbase-2.2.0 on i686-linux (testBoxAlgo.cpp) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:11:06 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:06:25PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Leo, and thanks for the perfect upstream bug report!
>
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
>
> > [1]
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2015-11/msg00179.html
>
> Small comment: address@hidden is linked to the bug tracker at
> <http://bugs.gnu.org/guix>. It is best to refer to the bug by canonical
> URL, <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049> in this case, and to Cc:
> address@hidden, so we keep track of the discussion.
D'oh! I made a note of this practice in the past but it slipped my mind.
>
> I reckon this is probably not obvious to someone who hasn’t used
> bugs.gnu.org before; maybe we should fix our documentation?
It's a good idea, especially for new packagers like me. I suppose under
packaging there could be a brief description of how to write a good bug
report in general as well as Guix-specific things like how to reference
the bug. As well as a reminder to practice rubber-duck debugging before
sending the bug report ;)
>
> Thanks again,
> Ludo’.