[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple versions
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple versions |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:58:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 05:40:02PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> It makes sence. The only problem is find required hash. Is it any idea
> to automate it?
Not really.
> > > In case of haskell/python/ruby libraries, I propose keep all versions
> > > multiplied by every version of compiler/interpreter.
> >
> > I do the same with Ruby using profiles. I have any number of interpreters
> > installed for testing and any number of libraries using either guix or
> > the lib path with a profile in there.
>
> But how do you solve problem, that for example you want library
> foo-999.very.new,
> compiled with ruby-1.8, but they never existed at same time in guix
> package tree?
You can use source trees with GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH. Maybe you'll have to
move them to a source file. It is less hard than it looks if you are
committed to the idea.
Pj.
- Multiple versions, Dmitry Bogatov, 2015/12/26
- Re: Multiple versions, Pjotr Prins, 2015/12/27
- Re: Multiple versions, Pjotr Prins, 2015/12/27
- Re: Multiple versions, Dmitry Bogatov, 2015/12/27
- Re: Multiple versions, Ricardo Wurmus, 2015/12/27
- Re: Multiple versions, Dmitry Bogatov, 2015/12/27
- Re: Multiple versions,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: Multiple versions, Ludovic Courtès, 2015/12/29
Re: Multiple versions, Alex Kost, 2015/12/27