[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt)
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:14:02 +0100 |
Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:
> (I've also thought that some sort of string reader similar to skribe's
> [foo ,(bar)] string-quasiquoting may make things easier. Might even be
> complimentary...)
I like this idea. It seems unrealistic to me to have configuration file
writers for each of the many ideosyncatic configuration file formats. I
also don’t enjoy having to concatenate strings to generate configuration
files and I think that it would be useful if we had string-quasiquoting.
But I think we need some example cases first. My experiences is
coloured by concatenating strings for udev rules. That’s not nice, but
I also would not want to have to learn a new Schemey way of expressing
these rules — especially when I just want to copy them with minimal
changes from documentation and don’t want to have to understand them
first.
~~ Ricardo
- Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/01/16
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt),
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/01/19
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/01/20
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/01/20
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/20
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Thompson, David, 2016/01/21
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/21
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/01/21
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Ludovic Courtès, 2016/01/24
- Re: Composing service definitions (and maybe fmt), Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/01/24