[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure on armhf
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure on armhf |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:12:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Hello,
and sorry for taking my time in replying around the Christmas holidays.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:45:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I guess he wants to build on that platform.
Indeed. However, my situation is a bit special: I am doing QA work on the Guix
GNU/Linux distribution and noticed numactl did not compile. Personally, I am
not using the software...
> If your headers don't have numa support at all it may be also possible
> that the platform simply doesn't support NUMA. In that case building
> numactl is pointless.
So I understand that numactl is not supported on armhf? In that case,
we can simply disable its build on this architecture.
Andreas
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Build failure on armhf,
Andreas Enge <=