Re: [RFC] Support for pam_limits.so: “su” is ignored.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>> I haven’t checked the feasibility etc., but eventually, maybe it would
>> be best to have Scheme bindings for limits.conf.  That way, we could
>> write services that extend ‘limits-service-type’ with new limits or
>> something.
>
> I’m not very familiar with limits.conf (I only copied the realtime audio
> settings from the JACK website), but it looks like the format is very
> simple.  We could certainly have something like a “limits-entry” to
> specify the limits and a matching service.

Sounds good.

Ludo’.