Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add nlopt.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello!

Roel Janssen <address@hidden> skribis:

> I think the licensing page on the website is pretty clear:
> http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt_License_and_Copyright
>
> From the page:
>> The NLopt library is under the GNU Lesser General Public License
>> (LGPL), and the copyrights are owned by a variety of authors.
>
> And:
>> The combination of all of this software is under the conjunction of the
>> license terms, and in particular they are limited by the most
>> restrictive of the licenses for the portions, which in this case is the
>> LGPL. (The other portions of NLopt are under LGPL-compatible,
>> less-restrictive licenses like the MIT license. So, if you remove the
>> LGPL portions, which are currently code by Ladislav Luksan, the
>> remainder reverts to a looser license.)

Still, according to luksan/COPYRIGHT, “[s]ubroutines PBUN, PNEW, PVAR,
PSEN” are “for your personal use […] [n]ot for redistribution”.

So my understanding is that we need to remove those four subroutines.
The rest in that directory is LGPLv2.1+.

WDYT?

I don’t see it at
<https://libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the_Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines>.
Debian has a package: <https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/nlopt>.
Could you check if they apply any patches?

Besides, I suggest reusing the bits about Guile bindings from the patch
I sent.

Thanks,
Ludo’.