[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patches question
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: patches question |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:09:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
ng0 <address@hidden> skribis:
> diff --git a/config/Makefile.in b/config/Makefile.in
> --- a/config/Makefile.in
> +++ b/config/Makefile.in
I view this patch as upstream work that Guix should not carry. To put
it differently, it’s not Guix’s missing to maintain a fork of Firefox
(or any other package).
> (define-public firefox
> (package
> (name "firefox")
> (version "45.2.0esr")
What is the goal here?
Guix proper can provide IceCat (which modifies Firefox to comply with
trademark rules, to comply with the GNU FSDG¹, and to enhance privacy),
maybe Tor Browser (assuming it complies with the FSDG as well), but not
stock Firefox (unless the trademark issue and FSDG violations are
resolved.)
Besides, I think it should be possible to (inherit icecat) rather than
duplicate all the recipe.
Hope this clarifies things!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
¹ https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
- patches question, ng0, 2016/06/23
- Re: patches question, ng0, 2016/06/23
- Re: patches question, Andreas Enge, 2016/06/23
- Re: patches question,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: patches question, ng0, 2016/06/24
- Tor Browser, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/24
- Re: Tor Browser, ng0, 2016/06/24
- Re: Tor Browser, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/26
- Re: Tor Browser, ng0, 2016/06/29
- Re: Tor Browser, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/30
- Re: Tor Browser, ng0, 2016/06/30
- Re: Tor Browser, ng0, 2016/06/30