[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing.
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing. |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2017 13:35:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi!
Regarding networking, would it make sense to use Connman (or
NetworkManger? or Wicd?) and simply talk to it?
I???ve never used it but it seems that Connman is a good middle ground.
We can send it RPCs I think, and it then takes care of all the plumbing,
so I suppose that would simplify the user interface (or we could just
launch the Connman CLI).
Thoughts?
It's a possibility. However we should watch out that the installer disk-image
does
not become too large ...
J'
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., (continued)
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., Chris Marusich, 2017/01/13
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., Chris Marusich, 2017/01/14
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., John Darrington, 2017/01/15
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., Chris Marusich, 2017/01/15
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., John Darrington, 2017/01/15
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/16
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing.,
John Darrington <=
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., John Darrington, 2017/01/16
- Re: Graphical Installer - Call for Testing., Chris Marusich, 2017/01/18