[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune
|
From: |
Carlo Zancanaro |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2017 08:43:28 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
On Thu, Jan 26 2017, Marius Bakke wrote
> I replaced the patch file with a substitution phase instead ... .
Is this the preferred way to patch reproducibility issues? I don't
really have a sense of it, but the other packages I have seen have used
either a patch or a snippet to make a build reproducible.
I don't really have a sense of when I should use a patch, a snippet, or
a phase. Can you give me a sense of when I should prefer one over the
others?
Carlo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Leo Famulari, 2017/01/10
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/01/20
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/26
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/01/26
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Marius Bakke, 2017/01/26
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune,
Carlo Zancanaro <=
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Marius Bakke, 2017/01/26
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Carlo Zancanaro, 2017/01/26
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add kakoune, Marius Bakke, 2017/01/26
- gzip embedded timestamps, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/27