|
| From: | Ricardo Wurmus |
| Subject: | Re: Debbugs handling of packages |
| Date: | Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:29:31 +0100 |
| User-agent: | mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>> This was discussed before at
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-09/msg00140.html>
>> and we could request a separate Debbugs instance for
>> address@hidden *right now* if we wanted to.
>>
>> What do other people think about this?
>
> I think we should just go ahead and setup that Debbugs instance like I
> said I’d do back in September. It can only be an improvement over what
> we have now anyway.
>
> Objections?
No objections, please go ahead!
Just a question: does this mean that patch *sets* should be flattened
before sending them so that they are part of the *same* debbugs issue
(instead of being scattered across as many issues as there are patches)?
E.g. for submitting the last 10 commits:
git format-patch -10 --stdout > series.patch
git send-email address@hidden series.patch
I guess we can play with this once we have the debbugs instance.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |