Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired)

guix-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired)

From:	Catonano
Subject:	Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired)
Date:	Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:37:04 +0100

2017-02-08 16:53 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>:

I’d like to avoid propagating inputs. Could we add a wrapper instead?
The wrapper would set the appropriate environment variables and retain a
reference to the JVM.

Good. So I can see how a wrapper is arranged

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), alex . ter . weele, 2017/02/06
- Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/02/07
  - Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), Ben Woodcroft, 2017/02/07
    - Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), Catonano, 2017/02/07
    - Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/02/08
    - Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired), Catonano <=

Prev by Date: Re: [Sharing store/state between Nix and Guix]: How stable is it?
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] build: Generalize 'package-with-explicit-python'.
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging leiningen (feedback desired)
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] import: json: Explicitly ask for JSON data.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread