[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Warning on using GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Warning on using GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:08:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Pjotr Prins wrote:
@FOSDEM we concluded that GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH does not necessarily work
that wel. I added to my guix-notes the following:
+Note that, even though GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH can be a feasible way of
+adding and maintaining packages, it has two largish downsides: (1) it
+is removed from the main package tree and therefore not easily shared
+and integrated and (2) to remain compatible you need to juggle two git
+trees which may go out of synch.
Those are indeed cavaets. But whether they are "downsides" or "largish" is
a matter for individual users to decide.
Some people 1) don't want to share the pacakges they create; and/or 2) are
prepared to accept the effort keeping the two things in sync.
J'
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature