[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH -v3] Fix gtk-im-modules for gtk+3
From: |
Huang\, Ying |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH -v3] Fix gtk-im-modules for gtk+3 |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:20:59 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (宋文武) writes:
> "Huang, Ying" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hi, Wenwu,
>>
>> address@hidden (宋文武) writes:
>>
>>> "Huang, Ying" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> - #$(if gtk+ (build gtk+ "3.0.0") #t)
>>>>> - #$(if gtk+-2 (build gtk+-2 "2.10.0") #t))))
>>>>> + #$(if gtk+
>>>>> + (build
>>>>> + gtk+ "3.0.0"
>>>>> + #~(string-append
>>>>> + #$gtk+:bin "/bin/gtk-query-immodules-3.0"))
>>>>
>>>> If "gtk+" is store path instead of package, this doesn't work. In a
>>>> previous version, "gtk+" will be store path, it is package now. If it
>>>> will always be package in the future. We can pass the store path of
>>>> target output too.
>>>
>>> Oh, you're right!
>>>
>>> We can use the gtk+ package object here:
>>>
>>> [attachment]
>>>
>>> 0001-profiles-gtk-im-modules-Fix-for-gtk3.patch
>>>
>>> From a0b9a36b4e902fd6f456fa596c6220c708c35f71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:41:47 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] profiles: gtk-im-modules: Fix for gtk3.
>>>
>>> Gtk+3 now have multiple outputs, so the gtk-query-immodules-3.0 should be
>>> find
>>> in output "bin" instead of "out".
>>>
>>> * guix/profiles.scm (gtk-im-modules): Pass the path of
>>> gtk-query-immodules-x.x
>>> as 'query' argument to the 'build' procedure.
>>> ---
>>> guix/profiles.scm | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/guix/profiles.scm b/guix/profiles.scm
>>> index 495a9e2e7..de82eae34 100644
>>> --- a/guix/profiles.scm
>>> +++ b/guix/profiles.scm
>>> @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ for both major versions of GTK+."
>>> (mlet %store-monad ((gtk+ (manifest-lookup-package manifest "gtk+"
>>> "3"))
>>> (gtk+-2 (manifest-lookup-package manifest "gtk+"
>>> "2")))
>>>
>>> - (define (build gtk gtk-version)
>>> + (define (build gtk gtk-version query)
>>> (let ((major (string-take gtk-version 1)))
>>> (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils)
>>> (guix build union)
>>> @@ -756,8 +756,6 @@ for both major versions of GTK+."
>>>
>>> (let* ((prefix (string-append "/lib/gtk-" #$major ".0/"
>>> #$gtk-version))
>>> - (query (string-append #$gtk
>>> "/bin/gtk-query-immodules-"
>>> - #$major ".0"))
>>> (destdir (string-append #$output prefix))
>>> (moddirs (cons (string-append #$gtk prefix
>>> "/immodules")
>>> (filter file-exists?
>>> @@ -768,7 +766,7 @@ for both major versions of GTK+."
>>>
>>> ;; Generate a new immodules cache file.
>>> (mkdir-p (string-append #$output prefix))
>>> - (let ((pipe (apply open-pipe* OPEN_READ query modules))
>>> + (let ((pipe (apply open-pipe* OPEN_READ #$query
>>> modules))
>>> (outfile (string-append #$output prefix
>>> "/immodules-gtk" #$major
>>> ".cache")))
>>> (dynamic-wind
>>> @@ -783,9 +781,23 @@ for both major versions of GTK+."
>>> (close-pipe pipe)))))))))
>>>
>>> ;; Don't run the hook when there's nothing to do.
>>> - (let ((gexp #~(begin
>>> - #$(if gtk+ (build gtk+ "3.0.0") #t)
>>> - #$(if gtk+-2 (build gtk+-2 "2.10.0") #t))))
>>> + (let* ((pkg-gtk+ (module-ref ; lazy reference
>>> + (resolve-interface '(gnu packages gtk)) 'gtk+))
>>> + (gexp #~(begin
>>> + #$(if gtk+
>>> + (build
>>> + gtk+ "3.0.0"
>>> + ;; Use 'gtk-query-immodules-3.0' from the 'bin'
>>> + ;; output of latest gtk+ package.
>>> + #~(string-append
>>> + #$pkg-gtk+:bin
>>> "/bin/gtk-query-immodules-3.0"))
>>> + #t)
>>> + #$(if gtk+-2
>>> + (build
>>> + gtk+-2 "2.10.0"
>>> + #~(string-append
>>> + #$gtk+-2 "/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0"))
>>> + #t))))
>>> (if (or gtk+ gtk+-2)
>>> (gexp->derivation "gtk-im-modules" gexp
>>> #:local-build? #t
>>
>> This should work. But I don't think it is perfect. It may refer to the
>> gtk-query-immodules-3.0 not with the exact same version.
>
> Yes.. but it's acceptable, if we don't require and use gtk+:bin in
> profile, then I think the latest gtk+ is the only choice?
Yes. I think so.
> Pushed, thank you!
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying