[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add tlp.
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add tlp. |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:14:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> + (home-page "http://linrunner.de/en/tlp/tlp.html")
> + (synopsis "Power management tool for Linux")
> + (description "TLP is a power management tool for Linux. It
comes with
>
> Shouldn't we changed "Linux" to "Linux based GNU systems" or something
similar?
It uses interfaces specific to the kernel Linux so I think it???s
technically correct.
But grammatically incorrect. Specifically, the preposition "for" is wrong.
It implies that the package provides some feature that Linux can use. Whereas
the opposite is true.
A more gramatically correct sentance might say "power management tool using
Linux kernel features".
But I wonder why we even mention it? I mean if a package happens to use libc,
we don't
say in the package description or sysnopsis "an editor which makes using the
fopen, and fclose calls of glibc".
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature