[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
guile2.2-gdbm-ffi issue
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
guile2.2-gdbm-ffi issue |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:29:01 -0600 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
(Originally accidentally sent this to address@hidden ... sorry!)
Hiya,
I pushed guile2.2-gdbm because it was just a couple of lines and it
seemed to work and didn't affect anything. I made a mistake though that
I didn't realize until I ran
"guix environment --ad-hoc guile-next guile2.2-gdbm-ffi --pure".
The trivial-build-system in guile-gdbm-ffi dumps the built module into
(string-append out "/share/guile/site/2.0") ... oops! Before I ran
--pure, the 2.0 directory was on my load path, and thus I didn't bump
into the error. (Maybe I should have asked for review anyway...)
I'm trying to think of how to fix this. I have a very kludgy solution
attached. I don't feel great about it but I don't know how to signal to
the builder whether it's using guile 2.2 or 2.0 otherwise. Thoughts?
From 711a23036417807d444729eaa778c9cadffa8646 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:24:57 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] guile-gdbm-ffi: Write to correct guile output directory.
* gnu/packages/guile.scm (make-guile-gdbm-ffi): New variable.
(guile-gdbm-ffi, guile2.2-gdbm-ffi): Use make-guile-gdbm-ffi.
---
gnu/packages/guile.scm | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm
index 3e8ab007b..3e62949f2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/guile.scm
@@ -825,9 +825,11 @@ inspired by the SCSH regular expression system.")
;; There are two guile-gdbm packages, one using the FFI and one with
;; direct C bindings, hence the verbose name.
-(define-public guile-gdbm-ffi
+(define (make-guile-gdbm-ffi guile-2.2?)
(package
- (name "guile-gdbm-ffi")
+ (name (if guile-2.2?
+ "guile2.2-gdbm-ffi"
+ "guile-gdbm-ffi"))
(version "20120209.fa1d5b6")
(source (origin
(method git-fetch)
@@ -848,7 +850,9 @@ inspired by the SCSH regular expression system.")
(system base compile))
(let* ((out (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))
- (module-dir (string-append out "/share/guile/site/2.0"))
+ (module-dir (string-append out "/share/guile/site/"
+ ,(if guile-2.2?
+ "2.2" "2.0")))
(source (assoc-ref %build-inputs "source"))
(doc (string-append out "/share/doc"))
(guild (string-append (assoc-ref %build-inputs "guile")
@@ -877,7 +881,8 @@ inspired by the SCSH regular expression system.")
(compile-file gdbm.scm-dest
#:output-file gdbm.go-dest)))))
(inputs
- `(("guile" ,guile-2.0)))
+ `(("guile" ,(if guile-2.2?
+ guile-next guile-2.0))))
(propagated-inputs
`(("gdbm" ,gdbm)))
(home-page "https://github.com/ijp/guile-gdbm")
@@ -887,8 +892,11 @@ inspired by the SCSH regular expression system.")
Guile's foreign function interface.")
(license gpl3+)))
+(define-public guile-gdbm-ffi
+ (make-guile-gdbm-ffi #f))
+
(define-public guile2.2-gdbm-ffi
- (package-for-guile-2.2 guile-gdbm-ffi))
+ (make-guile-gdbm-ffi #t))
(define-public guile-sqlite3
(let ((commit "607721fe1174a299e45d457acacf94eefb964071"))
--
2.11.0
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- guile2.2-gdbm-ffi issue,
Christopher Allan Webber <=
- Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages (was: guile2.2-gdbm-ffi issue), Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/02/11
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/02/11
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/02/12
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/02/13
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Andy Wingo, 2017/02/13
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/02/13
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Maxim Cournoyer, 2017/02/13
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/02/13
- Re: Fixing non-reproducibility in some guile packages, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/02/13