[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gnushogi and xshogi |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:06:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) |
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:19:19AM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 08:15:04PM +0100, John Darrington wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/games.scm (gnushogi, xshogi): New variables.
>
> > +(define-public xshogi
>
> [...]
>
> > + ;; Contains a copy of GPLv3 but the licence notices simply
> > + ;; state "GNU General Public Licence" without specifying a
> version.
> > + (license license:gpl1+)))
>
> Section 14 of the GPL says "If the Program does not specify a
> version number of the GNU General Public License, you may choose any
> version ever published by the Free Software Foundation."
>
> You are correct. That is why I put gpl1+
>
> Do we want to use version 1 of the GPL? I don't fully understand the
> issues with it, but it's an unusual choice.
>
> I don't have a strong opinion here. But there is a precedent in Guix, that
> where upstream permits a package to be distributed under a choice of licences,
> we simply present that choice to our users. We don't - at least I haven't
> seen
> any instances of it - choose a particular one that suits us, unless there is
> a
> good reason for doing that.
Okay, that makes sense to me. Please do as you see fit :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature