[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu-patches back log
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: gnu-patches back log |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Mar 2017 05:23:12 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.2 (2016-07-01) |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:14:52PM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 28.02.2017 um 07:25 schrieb Pjotr Prins:
> > Would it be an idea to send out weekly E-mails with patches that had
> > no attention to a select list of reviewers? Or maybe to the ML as a
> > whole? Basically it would read:
>
> This might be a good idea.
>
> Please mind adding links to that mail so one can easily access the
> patches and the "reports". This would make occasional reviewers live
> much easier.
Also, not all reviewers have push rights. Maybe we can add tags for
'PLEASE REVIEW', 'IN REVIEW', 'HELP WANTED', 'LGTM' and 'PLEASE PUSH'.
Without capitals ;)
That way the masters can quickly scan for pathes that need attention.
Pj.
- Re: gnu-patches back log,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: gnu-patches back log, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/01
- Re: gnu-patches back log, Pjotr Prins, 2017/03/01
- Re: gnu-patches back log, ng0, 2017/03/01
- Re: gnu-patches back log, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/01
- Re: gnu-patches back log, Pjotr Prins, 2017/03/01
- Re: gnu-patches back log, Leo Famulari, 2017/03/01