[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2)
From: |
Danny Milosavljevic |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add fpc. (version 2) |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:45:27 +0100 |
Hi,
>+ (copy-file (assoc-ref inputs "fpc-binary")
>+ "fpc-bin.tar")
>+ (zero? (system* "tar" "xvf" "fpc-bin.tar")))))
Why the copy-file and then untar ? Can't it be untarred immediately from where
it is? If it is useful, maybe add a comment about the reason.
Also, it might be easier to have a fpc-bootstrap package with the bootstrap
binaries that installs the binaries required to build fpc normally and to make
a fpc package depend on fpc-bootstrap as native-inputs. What do you think? I
myself don't have a strong preference about it - but some other packages do it
that way.
About the fpc-reproducibility.patch , it might make sense to file bugs upstream
about it so they add it on their side.
Also, these existing bootstrap compilers on sourceforge do not produce bit
reproducible executables, right? Should they also have the same patch applied
upstream in the future ?
Overall LGTM!
fpc supports armhf and usually so do we - although not here. We can add armhf
support in a future patch, though.