[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question related to outputs
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Question related to outputs |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:02:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> skribis:
> So, to have different build procedures for the same package I best
> define different packages and inherit? Rather than define different
> outputs - it just appeared natural to me ;).
Yeah it really depends. For debugging info, it’s definitely better to
have a “debug” output; if you instead had two different packages, that
would make debugging much less convenient (you’d have to first remove
the package-without-debugging-info, then install the
package-with-debugging-info, rebuild your stuff, etc.) In other cases,
the choice between an additional output and a separate package is less
obvious.
Thanks,
Ludo’.