[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’ |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:28:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello Guix! Hello 2.2 Guilers!
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I’d like to move support for Docker (currently in ‘guix archive’) to
> this new command because I think it’s more appropriate: ‘guix archive’
> is supposed to be rather low-level so it would not create a profile, for
> instance.
As of right now, ‘guix pack’ can create Docker image (‘guix archive’
can no longer do that):
guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0= -f docker
I’d be grateful if someone could check with Docker that I didn’t break
anything though. Any takers? :-)
The archive build process is bit-reproducible too, which is pretty cool
(Docker images created in January, 1970!).
That’s it!
Ludo’.
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, (continued)
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/14
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Federico Beffa, 2017/03/19
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/19
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Federico Beffa, 2017/03/20
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/20
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Andy Wingo, 2017/03/21
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Federico Beffa, 2017/03/22
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/24
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/20
- Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2017/03/20
Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’,
Ludovic Courtès <=