[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Being excellent to one another
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Being excellent to one another |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:44:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can
still agree on the following statements from my earlier email:
I agree to a slightly edited version:
-----------------
[...] sometimes there is not a simple solution, however :
- if you know someone has a preference for particular pronouns, use those
when
refering to that person.
- don't use pronouns when *you know* the other person does not identify
with them.
- if unsure, ask the person how he or she would like to be referenced.
If you make a mistake, an apology will show your intention was not
malicious.
In manuals we can just use "singular they", or another non-gender specific
form of reference.
-----------------
Alternatively it would be incumbent on you to provide an
alternative that is not just "I will bloody-mindedly stick to
gendering people when I don't know anything about them".
It is this tendency to call any difference of opinion by terms such as
"bloody-minded" which offends me - I try not to take offence - but I find
hard not to. I'm sorry.
To answer your question: How about saying "he or she" or "the person".
In the formal context, well??? I think there is broad consensus that
"singular they" is awesome.
There is a broad concensus that Donald Trump, Rodrigo Duterte and
Recep Erdogan are awesome. However I do not agree.
> People having been talking about being "welcoming". Well, I beleive the
way
> to achieve that is threefold:
>
> 1. Try not to offend.
> 2. Try not to be offended.
> 3. Recognise that diversity is an asset.
Absolutely, wonderful sentiment. To that I would add:
4. Respect the integrity and right to self-definition of all participants
I agree. Put that one in too.
J'
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encrypted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Being excellent to one another, (continued)
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Christopher Allan Webber, 2017/03/19
- Re: Being excellent to one another, dian_cecht, 2017/03/19
- Re: Being excellent to one another, John Darrington, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, John Darrington, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another,
John Darrington <=
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Catonano, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Alex Sassmannshausen, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Pjotr Prins, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, John Darrington, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, ng0, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, John Darrington, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, John Darrington, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, dian_cecht, 2017/03/20
- Re: Being excellent to one another, Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/03/21