[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES?
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
Subject: |
Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:28:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Hi,
within a few day I stumbled twice over this: When using docbook-xml or
docbook-xsl in a package description, one needs to set XML_CATALOG_FILES
to make xslproc (and others) find the catalogs.
Shouldn't XML_CATALOG_FILES be defined as native-search-paths?
IMHO users expect (at least I do :-) the .xml and .xsl files to be
available aber installation of these packages without further action
required.
BTW: For docbook-xsl the directory-name includes version, while for
docbook-xml it does not. Which one should be used?
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
- Shouldn't docbook-xml/xsl set XML_CATALOG_FILES?,
Hartmut Goebel <=