[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] QEMU 2.9.0-rc1
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] QEMU 2.9.0-rc1 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:37:10 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:27:54PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > gnu: qemu: Update to 2.9.0-rc1 [security fixes].
>
> I think it would be nice to have this in Guix proper (as a separate
> variable), so users don't have to apply this patch and build it
> manually. The downside is that it would land in users' profiles unless
> they take steps to prevent it, but I'm not sure how much of a problem
> that is given how easy it is to roll-back or exclude it. Thoughts?
I'm unsure if we should add it. QEMU usually goes through 4 or 5 release
candidates.
Does anyone have experience using these heavily? Are they stable or can
we expect them to be buggier than a real release?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature