[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
cuirass question
|
From: |
myglc2 |
|
Subject: |
cuirass question |
|
Date: |
Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:37:54 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 25.1.1 |
In "6.2.7.15 Continuous Integration" there is a reference to
'(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' but the doc is for GuixSD '(gnu
services cuirass)'.
And git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix/maintenance.git/hydra/bayfront.scm also
uses GuixSD '(gnu services cuirass)'.
So here is the question... Is it correct to assume that the primary
cuirass way forward is (gnu servies cuirass) on GuixSD?
If so, should the reference to '(https://notabug.org/mthl/cuirass)' be
removed?
TIA - George
- cuirass question,
myglc2 <=