[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staging
From: |
Marius Bakke |
Subject: |
Re: Staging |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:00:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.24.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:33:12PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> @Leo, others: I don't anticipate more staging updates in a while, should
>> we try and get this merged?
>
> Sure, I merged master into staging and started an evaluation of the
> staging branch.
"mesa" failed the same test on both i686 and armhf:
https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/staging/mesa-17.0.4.i686-linux
https://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/staging/mesa-17.0.4.armhf-linux
Oddly, I'm not able to reproduce it when compiling on x86_64:
$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux mesa
[...]
/gnu/store/kkpq84ki2ipjcn9nhywgm2ww9c5ddlaq-mesa-17.0.4
Can someone with a native machine get the "test-suite.log" of the
failing test?
I pushed a patch that should hopefully fix the "libsndfile" 1.0.28 armhf
failure. We should probably pick it to the graft on 'master' if it
works and staging drags out.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Staging, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/17
- Re: Staging,
Marius Bakke <=
- [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Marius Bakke, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Marius Bakke, 2017/04/18
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/19
- Re: [staging] Mesa FTBFS on 32-bit architectures, Leo Famulari, 2017/04/18
Re: Staging, Marius Bakke, 2017/04/21