[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image |
Date: |
Wed, 03 May 2017 02:26:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 5.2K bytes:
>> Anyway, I think we should polish and commit real soon. :-) Perhaps we
>> can add a note about endianness and assume little endian for now.
>
> Excuse me if I didn't pay much attention to the thread, I just flipped
> through all of it. Isn't that (little endian) the most common assumption
> most operation system have? I know that Gentoo defaults to little endian.
>
> https://packages.gentoo.org/useflags/search?q=big-endian
>
> And we don't support SuperH or similar Big Endian hardware. Or am I
> thinking about different reasons why the endianness here matters?
We should keep the door open to adding support for big-endian systems in
the future. That job will be made more difficult if we incorporate code
that assumes little-endian. Let's please strive for portability.
Mark
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/02
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, ng0, 2017/05/02
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/05/02
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/02
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/05/07
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/08
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/05/11
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/12
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/05/14
- Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/05/16
Re: GuixSD bootable ISO-9669 image, Danny Milosavljevic, 2017/05/02