[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: potluck status
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: potluck status |
Date: |
Wed, 03 May 2017 15:09:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Andy Wingo <address@hidden> skribis:
> Here is part of the documentation in that branch:
>
> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’
> ============================
Excellent, nicely written as usual!
> With the release of Guile 2.2.2, I have re-enabled
> https://guix-potluck.org. I also refactored that server's configuration
> to move some service definitions into Guix itself (the certbot service,
> for example); see:
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26684
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26685
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26686
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26687
Awesome.
> I also updated the code for "guix potluck host-channel" to show recent
> packages added, log entries, and so on. Finally I found the source of
> the HTTPS post error; it was in Guile:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/
>
> With that I think I'd like to move to a "use" phase where I just sit
> back and see how people use the thing :) WDYT? If you agree I can push
> patches from the above bugs into master maybe this weekend or so.
The week-end has passed ;-), but I agree. I’m taking a look at #26645
(the actual potluck patch) to see if I have anything to add, but yeah,
let’s push this real soon!
When we’re done, what about writing a blog post for the web site about
it? I guess it could largely be a copy/paste of the documentation you
posted above.
> We can fix the "specification->package" interface in parallel as
> discussed here:
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00401.html
>
> when we add the "guix channel" facility, which I guess will depend on
> guile-git.
Yes, post 0.13.0, we’ll depend on Guile-Git and start doing fun stuff
with it I hope.
Ludo’.